Apollo.io vs Clay
Choosing between Apollo.io and Clay? Here's how they compare on pricing, features, and best-fit use cases.
Choosing between Apollo.io and Clay? Apollo.io is best for SDR and outbound teams (a free tier, then $49/mo), while Clay suits RevOps and GTM engineers (a free tier, then $185/mo). Both serve the same job — pick on use-case fit and budget.
Apollo.io
4.7 /5All-in-one AI sales platform combining a 275M+ contact B2B database with prospecting, enrichment, and engagement.
| Apollo.io | Clay | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Sales & CRM | AI Sales & CRM |
| Best for | SDR and outbound teams, SMB and mid-market sales | RevOps and GTM engineers, Growth and outbound teams |
| Top use case | Find verified emails and phone numbers from a 275M+ contact database | Waterfall-enrich leads across 75+ providers for higher match rates |
| Starting price | Free tier · $49/mo | Free tier · $185/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Rating | 4.7 | 4.8 |
Which should you choose?
Choose Apollo.io if…
- SDR and outbound teams
- SMB and mid-market sales
- Founders doing their own prospecting
Edge: Best price-to-value: largest self-serve B2B database with a genuine free-forever tier
Choose Clay if…
- RevOps and GTM engineers
- Growth and outbound teams
- Agencies building custom prospecting workflows
Edge: Best for flexible, custom enrichment
Pros & cons, side by side
Apollo.io
Pros
- Massive verified contact database with a usable free plan
- Replaces several tools (data, sequencing, dialer, CRM enrichment) in one subscription
- 4.7/5 on G2 across 9,000+ reviews
Cons
- Data accuracy and email deliverability can vary, especially outside North America
- Credit limits and feature gating push heavy users to higher tiers quickly
Clay
Pros
- Highest match rates via multi-provider waterfall enrichment
- Claygent AI agent automates research that used to be manual
- Integrates with virtually every CRM and outreach tool
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than plug-and-play tools
- Credit-based pricing can get expensive at high volume
What to compare them on
Beyond pricing, these are the dimensions where Apollo.io and Clay differ most — weigh each against your own workflow:
- Best price-to-value: largest self-serve B2B database with a genuine free-forever tier
- Bundles data + sequencing + dialer + deal management in one tool vs point solutions
- US data depth is strong; EU/UK mobile coverage and compliance trail Cognism
- Best for flexible, custom enrichment vs Apollo's fixed all-in-one workflow
- Waterfall across 75+ sources beats single-vendor data accuracy
- Powerful but has a steeper learning curve and credit-based cost that scales fast
Bottom line
Clay scores higher in our rating (4.8/5 vs 4.7/5); Apollo.io has the lower entry price ($49/mo vs $185/mo). Apollo.io is built for SDR and outbound teams and SMB and mid-market sales; Clay suits RevOps and GTM engineers and growth and outbound teams. Both are AI Sales & CRM tools, so it comes down to which job is your priority and your budget. Verify pricing on each vendor's site (info as of June 2026).
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between Apollo.io and Clay?
Both are AI Sales & CRM tools. Apollo.io is geared toward SDR and outbound teams, while Clay suits RevOps and GTM engineers — the choice comes down to which job is your priority.
Is Apollo.io or Clay cheaper?
Apollo.io is the cheaper entry point ($49/mo vs $185/mo), and Apollo.io has a free tier to trial first.
Should I choose Apollo.io or Clay?
Choose Apollo.io if your priority is SDR and outbound teams; choose Clay if RevOps and GTM engineers matters more. Both are solid — the decision comes down to your specific use case, not a single score.
Related comparisons
Browse more tools
How visible is your brand in AI search?
Get a free MaxAEO diagnosis of your brand's mention rate, ranking, and sentiment across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and more.
Get your free AI visibility report