{"id":2007,"date":"2026-08-10T07:27:37","date_gmt":"2026-08-10T07:27:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-search-platform\/"},"modified":"2026-08-10T07:27:37","modified_gmt":"2026-08-10T07:27:37","slug":"ai-search-platform","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-search-platform\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Search Optimization Platform: Definition, Features, and Selection Framework"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Published on August 10, 2026 by maxaeo.ai.<\/p>\n<p>An <strong>AI search optimization platform<\/strong> helps brands measure, improve, and protect how they appear in AI-generated answers across systems such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Google AI Overviews, and AI Mode. The best platforms do more than count mentions: they test buyer prompts, analyze citations, benchmark competitors, detect misinformation, and turn findings into prioritized actions.<\/p>\n<p>This guide explains what the category should include, how it differs from traditional SEO software, and how to evaluate vendors without being distracted by vague \u201cGEO\u201d claims.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/backend-382-1.jpg\" alt=\"Dashboard concept for an AI search optimization platform showing prompts, citations, share of voice, and entity accuracy\"><\/p>\n<h2>What is an AI search optimization platform?<\/h2>\n<p>An <strong>AI search optimization platform<\/strong> is software for tracking and improving a brand\u2019s presence inside AI-generated answers, recommendations, citations, and summaries. It connects prompt monitoring, citation analysis, competitive benchmarking, entity accuracy, and content actions into one workflow.<\/p>\n<p>Traditional SEO tools measure how pages rank in search results. AI search tools measure whether answer engines understand, cite, recommend, or misrepresent a brand. That distinction matters because AI assistants often summarize the decision instead of sending users to ten blue links.<\/p>\n<p>A complete platform should answer four business questions:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Visibility:<\/strong> Does the brand appear for high-intent prompts?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Preference:<\/strong> Is it recommended ahead of competitors?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Accuracy:<\/strong> Are product facts, pricing claims, locations, funding, risks, or policies correct?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Influence:<\/strong> Which sources, pages, reviews, feeds, or third-party mentions appear to shape the answer?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The category overlaps with answer engine optimization, generative engine optimization, AI visibility analytics, and LLM brand monitoring. The names vary; the job is the same: make AI answers measurable enough to manage.<\/p>\n<h2>Why AI search optimization is not just \u201cSEO with new labels\u201d<\/h2>\n<p>AI search optimization still depends on crawlable, useful, authoritative web content, but it adds measurement layers that SEO tools were not built to capture. Google\u2019s own guidance says site owners should continue following Search fundamentals for generative AI features in Search, including helpful content, accessibility, structured data where appropriate, and snippet controls through robots directives (<a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/fundamentals\/ai-optimization-guide?authuser=4&amp;hl=en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Search Central\u2019s generative AI guidance<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>The difference is the output. In classic SEO, a page can rank fourth and still earn a click. In AI search, a brand may be omitted entirely, mentioned without a link, cited but not recommended, or recommended based on a third-party source.<\/p>\n<p>That creates new metrics:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>AI share of voice:<\/strong> how often a brand appears versus competitors.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Recommendation rate:<\/strong> how often the brand is selected as a suitable option.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Citation coverage:<\/strong> which URLs are used as supporting evidence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Answer accuracy:<\/strong> whether claims match verified brand facts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Sentiment and risk:<\/strong> whether answers include negative, outdated, or misleading framing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For a deeper KPI model, maxaeo.ai\u2019s guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-visibility-metrics\/\">AI visibility metrics, formulas, and benchmarks<\/a> explains how to quantify these signals without reducing them to a single vanity score.<\/p>\n<h2>The five jobs a serious platform must do<\/h2>\n<p>A platform in this category should perform five jobs well. If one is missing, the team will still need spreadsheets, manual prompt testing, or disconnected SEO tools.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Job<\/th>\n<th>What it should show<\/th>\n<th>Why it matters<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Prompt intelligence<\/td>\n<td>Real customer questions grouped by intent, funnel stage, geography, and persona<\/td>\n<td>AI answers vary by prompt wording, so one keyword list is not enough<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Multi-engine tracking<\/td>\n<td>Results across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Google AI Overviews, and other relevant answer surfaces<\/td>\n<td>Each engine has different retrieval, citation, and synthesis behavior<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Source and citation mapping<\/td>\n<td>Pages, domains, feeds, reviews, marketplaces, forums, and knowledge sources influencing answers<\/td>\n<td>Optimization requires knowing which evidence AI systems use<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Competitor comparison<\/td>\n<td>Recommendation share, cited sources, strengths, weaknesses, and positioning gaps<\/td>\n<td>AI assistants often produce shortlists, not isolated brand pages<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Action workflow<\/td>\n<td>Prioritized fixes for crawlability, content, entity data, product feeds, PR, reviews, and technical blockers<\/td>\n<td>Reporting without action does not improve visibility<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A useful way to evaluate maturity is to ask: <strong>does the tool only tell you what happened, or does it explain what to change next?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>That is where many early AI visibility trackers fall short. They monitor prompts, but they do not connect findings to the sources, content gaps, and technical access issues that caused the result.<\/p>\n<h2>A practical selection framework: the 100-point AEO Platform Score<\/h2>\n<p>The AEO Platform Score is a weighted evaluation framework for comparing AI search tools. It gives marketing, SEO, product, PR, and executive teams a shared way to judge whether a vendor can support real decisions.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Evaluation area<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align:right\">Weight<\/th>\n<th>What to inspect<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Prompt coverage and segmentation<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">20<\/td>\n<td>Buyer, investor, candidate, journalist, and support prompts; local and industry variants<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Engine coverage and reproducibility<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">15<\/td>\n<td>Which AI systems are tested; whether runs are timestamped, repeated, and version-aware<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Citation and source diagnostics<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">20<\/td>\n<td>Exact cited URLs, uncited source influence, missing citations, and third-party dependency<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Accuracy and risk detection<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">15<\/td>\n<td>Outdated claims, hallucinated facts, negative-news surfacing, entity confusion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Competitor recommendation analysis<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">10<\/td>\n<td>Side-by-side rankings, shortlist frequency, strengths, and disqualifiers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Workflow and integrations<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">10<\/td>\n<td>Task creation, content briefs, alerts, exports, Search Console or analytics connections<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Governance and reporting<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">10<\/td>\n<td>Role-based views, executive summaries, audit trails, and trend reporting<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A score above 80 suggests the platform can support ongoing AI search operations. A score between 60 and 80 is usually adequate for discovery and monitoring. Below 60 means the tool may be useful for audits but risky as a system of record.<\/p>\n<p>This framework adds one important lens missing from many comparison pages: <strong>platform value depends on the decisions it enables, not the number of AI engines it lists on the homepage.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>How to measure AI visibility without misleading yourself<\/h2>\n<p>AI visibility should be measured with repeated, segmented tests instead of one-off screenshots. A reliable program defines prompts, engines, locations, dates, competitors, expected facts, and scoring rules before collecting results.<\/p>\n<p>A strong measurement plan includes:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Prompt set design:<\/strong> Build prompts around real decision moments, such as \u201cbest platform for,\u201d \u201cis this company legit,\u201d \u201calternatives to,\u201d \u201cpricing for,\u201d and \u201ccompare X vs Y.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Persona segmentation:<\/strong> Separate buyers, candidates, investors, journalists, partners, and support users.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Repeat runs:<\/strong> Test more than once because AI answers can vary.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Source capture:<\/strong> Save citations, linked pages, and answer text.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Human verification:<\/strong> Compare generated claims against approved source-of-truth facts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Trend reporting:<\/strong> Track direction over time, not only a single snapshot.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The maxaeo.ai guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-share-of-voice\/\">AI share of voice<\/a> provides a practical formula for turning raw mentions into a comparable visibility metric.<\/p>\n<p>Independent research also supports the need for careful measurement. A 2026 survey of generative engine optimization research describes AI visibility as a partially observable pipeline involving crawling, retrieval, reranking, citation, prominence, and user behavior, while warning that stable cross-platform causal evidence remains limited (<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2607.14035\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">arXiv survey on generative engine optimization<\/a>). In plain terms: measure broadly, avoid magic-bullet claims, and separate correlation from proof.<\/p>\n<h2>What data should the platform collect?<\/h2>\n<p>The best data model captures more than whether a brand name appears. It records the full answer environment so teams can diagnose why the answer happened.<\/p>\n<p>At minimum, collect:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Prompt text and prompt category<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Engine, model surface, date, and location settings<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Brand mentions and competitor mentions<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Recommendation order and rationale<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Cited URLs and cited domains<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Uncited claims that need verification<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Sentiment or risk classification<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Entity attributes mentioned, such as category, products, leadership, funding, location, or policies<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Technical access status, including crawler blocks, login walls, consent banners, or WAF issues<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This matters because AI assistants often combine brand-owned pages with third-party pages, reviews, marketplaces, forums, news coverage, and structured feeds. If the tool only reports \u201cmentioned\/not mentioned,\u201d it cannot explain whether the opportunity is a content gap, reputation issue, crawlability problem, or source-authority deficit.<\/p>\n<p>For brand teams starting with the monitoring layer, maxaeo.ai\u2019s article on <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-brand-mention-tracking-tools\/\">AI brand mention tracking tools<\/a> explains which signals belong in a durable tracking setup.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/backend-382-2.jpg\" alt=\"Workflow diagram for AI search optimization showing prompt testing, citation mapping, source fixes, and measurement loops\"><\/p>\n<h2>Where platforms often fail: the blind spots to ask about<\/h2>\n<p>Many tools in this category look impressive in demos but fail under operating conditions. The most common blind spot is <strong>prompt representativeness<\/strong>: the platform tracks generic prompts that do not match how real buyers ask questions.<\/p>\n<p>Other failure points include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>No repeatability:<\/strong> The tool cannot show whether a result is stable or a one-time variation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>No citation depth:<\/strong> It captures links but not the claim each link supports.<\/li>\n<li><strong>No negative-answer monitoring:<\/strong> It misses outdated bad news, legal references, outages, layoffs, or scam-check prompts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>No technical diagnostics:<\/strong> It does not detect when AI crawlers or agentic browsers cannot access important pages.<\/li>\n<li><strong>No source-of-truth layer:<\/strong> It cannot compare AI claims against verified brand facts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>No action prioritization:<\/strong> Every issue appears equally urgent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Technical access deserves special attention. If answer engines cannot retrieve important pages because of robots rules, WAF settings, consent interstitials, or login requirements, visibility work may stall before content quality is even evaluated. maxaeo.ai\u2019s guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/robots-txt-ai-crawlers\/\">GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, and robots.txt tradeoffs<\/a> explains why crawler policy is now a strategic brand decision, not only a technical setting.<\/p>\n<p>Google also states that preview controls such as <code>nosnippet<\/code>, <code>max-snippet<\/code>, and <code>data-nosnippet<\/code> can affect how content appears across Search surfaces, including AI Overviews and AI Mode (<a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/crawling-indexing\/robots-meta-tag\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google\u2019s robots meta tag documentation<\/a>). That makes governance essential: blocking content may protect it from previews, but it can also reduce eligibility for certain AI search experiences.<\/p>\n<h2>How enterprise teams should use an AI search optimization platform<\/h2>\n<p>Enterprise teams should treat AI search optimization as a cross-functional operating system, not a content-only campaign. The work touches SEO, communications, product marketing, developer relations, legal, recruiting, investor relations, and customer support.<\/p>\n<p>A practical operating rhythm looks like this:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Monthly visibility audit:<\/strong> Review share of voice, recommendation rate, and high-risk prompts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Weekly issue triage:<\/strong> Classify issues as content, citation, entity, reputation, technical, or policy problems.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Source-of-truth updates:<\/strong> Maintain pages that clearly state products, use cases, pricing logic, leadership, locations, and trust signals.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Competitor review:<\/strong> Identify where competitors are recommended and why.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Content and PR actions:<\/strong> Create or improve assets that answer missing questions with evidence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Technical checks:<\/strong> Confirm that important pages are crawlable and accessible to relevant bots and user agents.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Executive reporting:<\/strong> Track visibility movement, risk reduction, and assisted pipeline indicators.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Google\u2019s Search Console added generative AI performance reporting in 2026, including dedicated reporting for Search and Discover generative AI features (<a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/blog\/2026\/06\/gen-ai-performance-reports\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Search Central announcement<\/a>). That is useful for Google surfaces, but it does not replace multi-engine monitoring across assistant ecosystems.<\/p>\n<h2>What to ask vendors before buying<\/h2>\n<p>The best vendor questions expose whether the platform can support decisions after the demo ends. Use these questions before signing a contract:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Which AI engines and surfaces are monitored today, and how often are they tested?<\/li>\n<li>Can prompts be grouped by funnel stage, persona, country, and language?<\/li>\n<li>Does the platform store answer history, citations, timestamps, and screenshots or raw output?<\/li>\n<li>How does it handle answer variability across repeated runs?<\/li>\n<li>Can it identify cited sources versus inferred or uncited claims?<\/li>\n<li>Does it flag incorrect facts and compare them with an approved source of truth?<\/li>\n<li>Can it track competitor recommendation share over time?<\/li>\n<li>Does it diagnose blocked crawlers, consent walls, WAF errors, and inaccessible pages?<\/li>\n<li>Can teams export data or connect it to BI, analytics, or workflow systems?<\/li>\n<li>What optimization actions does the platform recommend, and how are priorities calculated?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For competitive programs, the key question is not \u201cDo we appear?\u201d It is <strong>\u201cWhen an AI assistant builds a shortlist, why does it choose us, choose a competitor, or choose neither?\u201d<\/strong> The maxaeo.ai framework for <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-competitor-recommendation-analysis\/\">AI competitor recommendation analysis<\/a> goes deeper into that shortlist problem.<\/p>\n<h2>A 30-day rollout plan<\/h2>\n<p>A first month should produce a baseline, not a perfect AI search strategy. The goal is to create a repeatable measurement loop and identify the first set of fixes.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Days 1\u20135: Define the prompt universe.<\/strong><br \/>\nList 50\u2013150 prompts across buyer, competitor, trust, pricing, support, hiring, and investor questions. Include branded, non-branded, and comparison wording.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Days 6\u201310: Establish source-of-truth facts.<\/strong><br \/>\nDocument approved facts about products, categories, leadership, locations, policies, funding, security, and customer segments.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Days 11\u201315: Run multi-engine baseline tests.<\/strong><br \/>\nCapture mentions, recommendations, citations, sentiment, and inaccuracies across priority engines.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Days 16\u201320: Diagnose sources and blockers.<\/strong><br \/>\nMap which pages are cited, which competitors own the evidence layer, and whether technical controls block useful access.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Days 21\u201325: Prioritize fixes.<\/strong><br \/>\nSeparate quick wins from structural issues. Update unclear pages, strengthen comparison content, improve schema where relevant, and fix access barriers.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Days 26\u201330: Report and operationalize.<\/strong><br \/>\nCreate a dashboard with share of voice, recommendation rate, citation coverage, factual accuracy, and open risks. Assign owners for ongoing work.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/backend-382-3.jpg\" alt=\"Example scorecard for evaluating an AI search optimization platform with weighted criteria and action priorities\"><\/p>\n<h2>Common questions<\/h2>\n<h3>Is an AI search optimization platform the same as a GEO platform?<\/h3>\n<p>An AI search optimization platform and a GEO platform often describe the same category, but the stronger term is broader. GEO focuses on generative engines; AI search optimization also includes AI Overviews, AI Mode, answer engines, chat assistants, voice assistants, and agentic shopping surfaces.<\/p>\n<h3>Can a platform guarantee rankings in ChatGPT or Gemini?<\/h3>\n<p>No credible platform can guarantee persistent rankings across AI assistants. Outputs vary by prompt, model, retrieval layer, personalization, geography, freshness, and available sources. A trustworthy platform should measure patterns, identify likely causes, and prioritize actions rather than promise control.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the most important metric to track first?<\/h3>\n<p>Start with <strong>recommendation rate<\/strong> for high-intent prompts, then add AI share of voice, citation coverage, and factual accuracy. Mentions alone can be misleading because a brand may appear in an answer but not be recommended.<\/p>\n<h3>Do AI search tools replace SEO tools?<\/h3>\n<p>No. SEO tools remain important for crawlability, technical health, keyword research, backlinks, and organic performance. AI search tools add visibility, citation, and answer-quality data that traditional ranking platforms usually do not capture.<\/p>\n<h3>Who should own AI search optimization?<\/h3>\n<p>Ownership depends on the company, but the operating group should include SEO, content, communications, product marketing, and technical web teams. Legal, recruiting, investor relations, and customer support should participate when AI answers affect trust, risk, hiring, or due diligence.<\/p>\n<h2>Bottom line<\/h2>\n<p>An <strong>AI search optimization platform<\/strong> should help teams understand how answer engines describe, cite, compare, and recommend their brand. The category is young, so the safest buying approach is to evaluate platforms by measurement quality, source diagnostics, accuracy controls, and workflow depth.<\/p>\n<p>The winning platform is not the one with the most buzzwords. It is the one that turns uncertain AI answers into a repeatable operating system: test prompts, map sources, fix gaps, verify facts, and measure whether the brand becomes more visible, accurate, and recommendable over time.<\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"Article\",\n  \"headline\": \"AI Search Optimization Platform: Definition, Features, and Selection Framework\",\n  \"description\": \"AI search optimization platform guide for teams choosing tools: features, metrics, workflows, and a weighted scorecard. Compare options with confidence.\",\n  \"author\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"maxaeo.ai\"\n  },\n  \"publisher\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"maxaeo.ai\"\n  },\n  \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-10\",\n  \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-10\",\n  \"image\": \"image-placeholder\",\n  \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n    \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n    \"@id\": \"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-search-platform\/\"\n  }\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AI search optimization platform guide for teams choosing tools: features, metrics, workflows, and a weighted scorecard. Compare options with confidence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2006,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2007"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2007\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2006"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}