
{"id":1889,"date":"2026-08-06T08:32:54","date_gmt":"2026-08-06T08:32:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-chatbot-brand-sentiment-analysis\/"},"modified":"2026-08-06T12:32:09","modified_gmt":"2026-08-06T12:32:09","slug":"ai-chatbot-brand-sentiment-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-chatbot-brand-sentiment-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Chatbot Brand Sentiment Analysis: A Practical Measurement Framework"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis is the process of measuring whether AI assistants describe a brand positively, neutrally, or negatively across prompts, platforms, competitors, and cited sources.<\/strong> It goes beyond counting mentions: it explains the tone, claims, comparisons, and evidence shaping a buyer\u2019s first impression.<\/p>\n<p>That distinction matters because answer engines now summarize reputations before users click a website. A brand can be visible in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, or AI Overviews and still lose demand if the summary says it is \u201cexpensive,\u201d \u201chard to implement,\u201d \u201cless mature,\u201d or \u201cbest for small teams only.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This guide gives marketing, SEO, PR, and product teams a measurement system they can use without treating sentiment as a vague dashboard score.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/backend-44-1.png\" alt=\"AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis dashboard showing positive, neutral, and negative brand narratives\"><\/p>\n<h2>What is AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis?<\/h2>\n<p><strong>AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis measures the tone and meaning of AI-generated brand mentions in conversational answers.<\/strong> The unit of analysis is not a tweet, review, or article. It is the answer a buyer sees when they ask an AI assistant for advice.<\/p>\n<p>Traditional sentiment analysis studies human-authored text such as reviews, social posts, support tickets, or survey responses. AI search sentiment monitoring studies model-authored summaries that synthesize many sources.<\/p>\n<p>A strong analysis captures five things:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Mention presence<\/strong>: whether the brand appears at all.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Sentiment polarity<\/strong>: positive, neutral, mixed, or negative.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Sentiment intensity<\/strong>: how strongly the answer praises or criticizes the brand.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Narrative theme<\/strong>: what the model says the brand is known for.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evidence trail<\/strong>: which pages, reviews, or citations appear to shape the claim.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Research on ChatGPT as a sentiment analyzer has shown why a simple \u201cask the model if this is positive or negative\u201d method is not enough. One study evaluated ChatGPT across <strong>7 sentiment tasks and 17 benchmark datasets<\/strong>, including polarity-shift and open-domain settings, showing that sentiment judgment depends heavily on task design and prompting (<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2304.04339\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">arXiv: Is ChatGPT a Good Sentiment Analyzer?<\/a>).<\/p>\n<h2>Why brand sentiment in AI answers is different from social sentiment<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Social sentiment tells you what people are saying. AI sentiment tells you what answer engines repeat, compress, and recommend.<\/strong> The second layer can amplify old narratives, flatten nuance, and turn scattered opinions into a confident buying recommendation.<\/p>\n<p>For example, a few old reviews may say a product was difficult to onboard in 2023. If newer documentation and customer proof are thin, an AI assistant may still summarize the brand as \u201cpowerful but complex\u201d in 2026. The problem is not only reputation. It is retrieval, evidence, and narrative freshness.<\/p>\n<p>This is why AI sentiment should be tracked alongside visibility. Use <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-generated-brand-mention-checker\/\">AI-generated brand mention checking<\/a> to find where your brand appears, then evaluate whether those mentions help or hurt the buyer journey.<\/p>\n<p>The highest-risk cases are often not openly negative. They are limiting labels:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u201cBest for startups\u201d when you sell enterprise.<\/li>\n<li>\u201cAffordable alternative\u201d when you lead on quality.<\/li>\n<li>\u201cKnown for SEO\u201d when your product has expanded into AI search.<\/li>\n<li>\u201cPopular but lacks advanced reporting\u201d after the feature has shipped.<\/li>\n<li>\u201cComparable to X\u201d when your positioning has moved away from that category.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>The maxaeo.ai 4-layer sentiment model<\/h2>\n<p><strong>A useful AI sentiment score should separate tone, claim accuracy, buyer impact, and source fixability.<\/strong> Most dashboards collapse these into one number, which makes the report easy to read but hard to act on.<\/p>\n<p>The maxaeo.ai framework uses four layers:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Layer<\/th>\n<th>Question answered<\/th>\n<th>Example signal<\/th>\n<th>Why it matters<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Tone<\/td>\n<td>Is the wording positive, neutral, mixed, or negative?<\/td>\n<td>\u201cReliable but expensive\u201d<\/td>\n<td>Shows emotional direction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Claim<\/td>\n<td>Is the statement accurate and current?<\/td>\n<td>\u201cNo enterprise controls\u201d after launch<\/td>\n<td>Finds factual drift<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Buyer impact<\/td>\n<td>Could this change shortlist behavior?<\/td>\n<td>\u201cBetter for small teams\u201d<\/td>\n<td>Prioritizes revenue risk<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Source fixability<\/td>\n<td>Can the cause be influenced?<\/td>\n<td>Old review page, outdated comparison, missing docs<\/td>\n<td>Turns insight into action<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>This creates more useful decisions than a single polarity score. A mildly negative but false claim on a high-intent comparison prompt can deserve faster action than a strongly negative answer on a low-volume curiosity prompt.<\/p>\n<p>For teams already measuring AI visibility, connect this model to <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-share-of-voice\/\">AI share of voice<\/a> so sentiment is weighted by competitive exposure, not treated as an isolated brand metric.<\/p>\n<h2>How to measure AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis step by step<\/h2>\n<p><strong>The best measurement process samples realistic buyer prompts, runs them across multiple answer engines, scores responses with a rubric, and links each sentiment pattern to a likely source or content gap.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Use this workflow.<\/p>\n<h3>1. Build a prompt set from real buyer intent<\/h3>\n<p>A credible prompt set should include category, comparison, alternative, problem, pricing, implementation, and reputation questions.<\/p>\n<p>Examples:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>\u201cWhat are the best platforms for monitoring AI search visibility?\u201d<\/li>\n<li>\u201cCompare Brand A vs Brand B for enterprise teams.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>\u201cWhat are the downsides of Brand A?\u201d<\/li>\n<li>\u201cWhich tools are best for tracking AI brand mentions?\u201d<\/li>\n<li>\u201cIs Brand A reliable for agencies?\u201d<\/li>\n<li>\u201cWhat do customers say about Brand A support?\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>For most B2B teams, start with <strong>50\u2013150 prompts<\/strong>. Fewer than 30 usually produces unstable conclusions. More than 300 is useful only after the taxonomy is clean.<\/p>\n<h3>2. Run prompts across the platforms buyers use<\/h3>\n<p>Do not assume one chatbot represents the market. ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok, and AI Overviews can differ because of model behavior, retrieval sources, browsing settings, personalization, and citation policies.<\/p>\n<p>At minimum, segment results by:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Platform<\/li>\n<li>Model or mode where available<\/li>\n<li>Prompt type<\/li>\n<li>Geography or language<\/li>\n<li>Device or signed-in state if relevant<\/li>\n<li>Date of capture<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This is also where <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-search-engine-monitoring-tools\/\">AI search engine monitoring tools<\/a> become useful. Manual checks are fine for diagnosis, but they are too inconsistent for trend reporting.<\/p>\n<h3>3. Score tone and intensity separately<\/h3>\n<p>Use four tone labels: <strong>positive, neutral, mixed, negative<\/strong>. Then add intensity on a 1\u20135 scale.<\/p>\n<p>A \u201cmixed\u201d answer with a 5 intensity is often more important than a \u201cnegative\u201d answer with a 1 intensity. For example, \u201cgood product but not suitable for regulated enterprises\u201d can disqualify a buyer immediately.<\/p>\n<p>A practical scoring rubric:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"text-align:right\">Score<\/th>\n<th>Meaning<\/th>\n<th>Example<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">+5<\/td>\n<td>Strong recommendation<\/td>\n<td>\u201cA leading choice for enterprise AI visibility teams\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">+3<\/td>\n<td>Clear positive<\/td>\n<td>\u201cStrong reporting and competitive tracking\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">0<\/td>\n<td>Neutral mention<\/td>\n<td>\u201cOffers AI search monitoring features\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">-3<\/td>\n<td>Clear concern<\/td>\n<td>\u201cMay lack depth for larger teams\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">-5<\/td>\n<td>Strong disqualification<\/td>\n<td>\u201cNot recommended for enterprise use\u201d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>4. Extract the narrative, not just the label<\/h3>\n<p>Sentiment is only useful when it names the reason. Tag every response with one or more narrative themes.<\/p>\n<p>Common themes include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Pricing and value<\/li>\n<li>Accuracy and data freshness<\/li>\n<li>Ease of setup<\/li>\n<li>Enterprise readiness<\/li>\n<li>Integrations<\/li>\n<li>Support quality<\/li>\n<li>Market leadership<\/li>\n<li>Feature completeness<\/li>\n<li>Trust and security<\/li>\n<li>Best-fit customer segment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This turns reporting into prioritization. If 38% of negative responses cite \u201climited integrations,\u201d the next action may be integration documentation, partner pages, product announcements, and third-party validation.<\/p>\n<h3>5. Capture citations and likely source paths<\/h3>\n<p>For retrieval-grounded answers, save cited URLs. For non-cited answers, record repeated phrases and compare them against visible web sources such as review pages, comparison articles, support docs, press coverage, Reddit threads, and old product pages.<\/p>\n<p>A sentiment report without source diagnosis is only a weather report. It says a storm exists but not where to reinforce the roof.<\/p>\n<p>Teams can pair sentiment scoring with <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-search-engine-recommendation-monitoring\/\">AI search engine recommendation monitoring<\/a> to understand when answer engines not only mention the brand but actively recommend or exclude it.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/backend-44-2.png\" alt=\"Workflow diagram connecting prompts, chatbot answers, sentiment scoring, source diagnosis, and content fixes\"><\/p>\n<h2>A practical scoring formula for AI brand sentiment<\/h2>\n<p><strong>A useful brand sentiment index should weight each answer by sentiment intensity, prompt importance, and brand position.<\/strong> This prevents low-value prompts from distorting strategic decisions.<\/p>\n<p>Use this formula:<\/p>\n<p><code>Weighted Sentiment = Sentiment Score \u00d7 Prompt Intent Weight \u00d7 Position Weight<\/code><\/p>\n<p>Suggested weights:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Factor<\/th>\n<th style=\"text-align:right\">Recommended range<\/th>\n<th>Example<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Sentiment score<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">-5 to +5<\/td>\n<td>\u201cToo expensive\u201d = -3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Prompt intent weight<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">1 to 3<\/td>\n<td>\u201cBest vendor for enterprise\u201d = 3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Position weight<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align:right\">0.5 to 1.5<\/td>\n<td>First recommended brand = 1.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Then calculate:<\/p>\n<p><code>AI Brand Sentiment Index = Sum of Weighted Sentiment \/ Sum of Maximum Possible Positive Score<\/code><\/p>\n<p>This creates a normalized percentage from -100% to +100%.<\/p>\n<p>A brand with a +42% score is not simply \u201cpositive.\u201d It means that, across the tracked prompt set, the brand captures 42% of the possible positive sentiment after weighting for prompt value and answer position.<\/p>\n<h2>What a one-page sentiment report should include<\/h2>\n<p><strong>An effective AI sentiment report should show executives what changed, why it changed, where it happened, and what action is next.<\/strong> Avoid reporting only average sentiment because averages hide urgent risks.<\/p>\n<p>Include these sections:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Executive summary<\/strong>: positive, mixed, and negative share across tracked prompts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Platform split<\/strong>: where sentiment is strongest and weakest.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Competitor delta<\/strong>: how your brand compares against named rivals.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Top positive narratives<\/strong>: claims to reinforce in content and sales enablement.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Top negative narratives<\/strong>: claims to investigate or correct.<\/li>\n<li><strong>High-risk prompts<\/strong>: buyer-intent prompts where sentiment could affect pipeline.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cited source map<\/strong>: URLs or source categories linked to each narrative.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Action queue<\/strong>: product, PR, SEO, review, and content tasks.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>For benchmarking, combine this report with <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/ai-visibility-metrics\/\">AI visibility metrics<\/a> such as citation rate, recommendation rate, and AI share of voice. Sentiment answers whether visibility is persuasive.<\/p>\n<h2>How to improve negative or outdated AI sentiment<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Improving AI sentiment means changing the evidence available to answer engines, not trying to manipulate a chatbot response directly.<\/strong> The durable fix is to publish, update, and earn sources that make the accurate narrative easier to retrieve.<\/p>\n<p>Start with the cause.<\/p>\n<p>If the issue is outdated product information:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Update feature pages and documentation.<\/li>\n<li>Publish release notes with dates.<\/li>\n<li>Add comparison pages that clarify current capabilities.<\/li>\n<li>Refresh old blog posts that still rank or get cited.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If the issue is review-driven:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Analyze review text by theme.<\/li>\n<li>Fix recurring operational problems.<\/li>\n<li>Ask satisfied customers for detailed, specific reviews.<\/li>\n<li>Respond professionally to negative reviews with factual updates.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If the issue is competitive framing:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Create side-by-side pages with transparent criteria.<\/li>\n<li>Publish customer use cases for the segment you want to own.<\/li>\n<li>Strengthen third-party proof through analyst mentions, partner pages, and reputable coverage.<\/li>\n<li>Avoid attacking competitors; answer engines tend to summarize comparative evidence, not slogans.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If the issue is missing authority:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Publish original benchmarks.<\/li>\n<li>Add named subject-matter experts.<\/li>\n<li>Use clear dates and versioning.<\/li>\n<li>Make claims verifiable.<\/li>\n<li>Ensure important pages are crawlable by relevant bots and not blocked by unnecessary interstitials.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Google\u2019s guidance on people-first content emphasizes original, helpful information rather than content made only to attract visits (<a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/fundamentals\/creating-helpful-content\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google Search Central: creating helpful content<\/a>). The same principle applies to answer engines: stronger evidence beats louder messaging.<\/p>\n<h2>Common mistakes that make sentiment data misleading<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Most bad sentiment programs fail because they measure too few prompts, ignore platform differences, or treat every mention as equally important.<\/strong> These shortcuts create dashboards that look precise but produce weak decisions.<\/p>\n<p>Avoid these mistakes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Using only branded prompts.<\/strong> \u201cWhat is Brand X?\u201d rarely reveals competitive risk.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ignoring mixed sentiment.<\/strong> Many harmful answers include praise before the disqualifier.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Averaging all prompts equally.<\/strong> A buying prompt should matter more than a casual definition.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tracking only one platform.<\/strong> Chatbots can disagree sharply.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Failing to save full responses.<\/strong> You need the wording, not just the label.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Not tracking competitors.<\/strong> Sentiment is relative in shortlists.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Confusing accuracy with positivity.<\/strong> A negative answer may reflect a real product gap.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reacting to one-off answers.<\/strong> Look for repeated themes across prompts and platforms.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A good program separates three categories: reputation issue, content issue, and product issue. Each needs a different owner.<\/p>\n<h2>Recommended operating cadence<\/h2>\n<p><strong>AI sentiment should be monitored weekly for stable categories and daily during launches, crises, or major competitive shifts.<\/strong> The cadence should match how quickly the underlying evidence changes.<\/p>\n<p>Use this rhythm:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Cadence<\/th>\n<th>Best for<\/th>\n<th>Action<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Daily<\/td>\n<td>PR events, outages, viral reviews, product launches<\/td>\n<td>Watch retrieval-grounded platforms and high-risk prompts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Weekly<\/td>\n<td>Active SEO, GEO, and category monitoring<\/td>\n<td>Track trend lines and emerging narratives<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Monthly<\/td>\n<td>Executive reporting<\/td>\n<td>Summarize sentiment, visibility, competitor delta, and fixes shipped<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Quarterly<\/td>\n<td>Strategy planning<\/td>\n<td>Rebuild prompt taxonomy and compare against pipeline data<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The important point is consistency. Use the same prompt set, scoring rubric, platform list, and weighting rules long enough to see movement. Change the system only when buyer behavior or product positioning changes.<\/p>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>Is AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis the same as social listening?<\/h3>\n<p>No. Social listening measures public conversation from humans. AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis measures how AI assistants synthesize that conversation, along with reviews, articles, documentation, and other sources, into buyer-facing answers.<\/p>\n<h3>How many prompts do I need for reliable results?<\/h3>\n<p>For an initial audit, 50\u2013150 well-chosen prompts is usually enough to reveal major patterns. For enterprise reporting, use a larger set organized by product line, region, buyer segment, and competitor group.<\/p>\n<h3>Can negative AI sentiment be fixed?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, but not by asking the chatbot to change its mind. Fix the underlying evidence: outdated pages, weak documentation, unresolved review themes, missing proof, inaccurate third-party claims, and thin comparison content.<\/p>\n<h3>Should sentiment be measured manually or with software?<\/h3>\n<p>Manual reviews are useful for diagnosis and rubric design. Ongoing monitoring needs software because prompt runs, platform differences, citation capture, and trend comparisons are too time-consuming to manage in spreadsheets.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the most important metric?<\/h3>\n<p>The most useful metric is not average sentiment. It is <strong>weighted sentiment on high-intent prompts versus competitors<\/strong>, supported by the exact narratives and sources that caused the score.<\/p>\n<h2>The bottom line<\/h2>\n<p><strong>AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis turns answer-engine visibility into a quality signal.<\/strong> It shows whether your brand is merely mentioned, actively recommended, cautiously framed, or quietly disqualified.<\/p>\n<p>The best teams do not treat sentiment as a vanity metric. They connect it to buyer intent, competitor comparisons, source quality, product truth, and measurable content work. That is how AI brand monitoring becomes an operating system for reputation, SEO, PR, and revenue teams.<\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"Article\",\n  \"headline\": \"AI Chatbot Brand Sentiment Analysis: A Practical Measurement Framework\",\n  \"description\": \"AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis reveals how answer engines describe your brand, why sentiment shifts, and what to fix first. Start measuring with a clear framework.\",\n  \"author\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"maxaeo.ai\"\n  },\n  \"datePublished\": \"2026-08-05\",\n  \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-05\",\n  \"image\": \"image-placeholder\",\n  \"publisher\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"maxaeo.ai\"\n  }\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AI chatbot brand sentiment analysis reveals how answer engines describe your brand, why sentiment shifts, and what to fix first. Start measuring with a clear framework.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1888,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1889"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1889\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1897,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1889\/revisions\/1897"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1888"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}