{"id":1036,"date":"2026-07-08T08:29:52","date_gmt":"2026-07-08T08:29:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/aeo-specialist-job-description\/"},"modified":"2026-07-08T08:29:52","modified_gmt":"2026-07-08T08:29:52","slug":"aeo-specialist-job-description","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/aeo-specialist-job-description\/","title":{"rendered":"AEO Specialist Job Description: Responsibilities, Skills, Scorecard, and JD Template"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An <strong>AEO specialist job description<\/strong> should hire for one business outcome: improving how AI answer engines mention, cite, rank, describe, and recommend the company. The role is not an AI content writer role. It combines SEO, content strategy, technical diagnosis, citation analysis, product marketing, PR coordination, AI search monitoring, and executive reporting.<\/p>\n<p>The title is still new. Some teams call the role <strong>AI Search Specialist<\/strong>, <strong>GEO Specialist<\/strong>, <strong>LLM Visibility Manager<\/strong>, <strong>AI Visibility Lead<\/strong>, <strong>Answer Engine Optimization Specialist<\/strong>, or <strong>AI Search Optimization Manager<\/strong>. The title matters less than the operating model: the person must find where the brand is missing or misrepresented in AI answers, diagnose why, ship fixes, and prove movement over time.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"max-width:100%;height:auto\" loading=\"lazy\"  src=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/1783438146107-5-46112-1.jpg\" alt=\"AEO specialist job description scorecard showing AI prompts, citation gaps, competitor mentions, and fix velocity\"><\/figure>\n<h2>Quick Answer: What Does an AEO Specialist Do?<\/h2>\n<p>An <strong>AEO specialist<\/strong> improves a brand&#39;s visibility and accuracy in AI-generated answers. The role owns prompt research, AI search monitoring, citation analysis, content and technical fixes, earned-source gaps, competitor tracking, and reporting across engines such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode.<\/p>\n<p>A strong AEO specialist usually owns:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Prompt coverage:<\/strong> Which buyer, brand, competitor, and category questions should be tracked.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Answer visibility:<\/strong> Whether the brand is mentioned, ranked, cited, omitted, or misdescribed.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Citation gaps:<\/strong> Which sources AI systems rely on instead of the company&#39;s own or earned assets.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fix prioritization:<\/strong> What content, technical SEO, PR, profile, or product-marketing work should ship first.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Proof of movement:<\/strong> Whether answer visibility, accuracy, citations, and competitor share improve over time.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Copy-Ready AEO Specialist Job Description<\/h2>\n<p>Use this template for a careers page, internal headcount request, or agency brief. Adjust seniority, reporting line, compensation, geography, and tool stack before publishing.<\/p>\n<pre><code class=\"language-text\">Job title:\nAEO Specialist \/ AI Search Specialist \/ GEO Specialist\n\nReports to:\nDirector of SEO, Organic Growth, Demand Generation, Product Marketing, or Integrated Marketing\n\nRole summary:\nWe are hiring an AEO Specialist to improve how AI answer engines mention, cite, rank, describe, and recommend our brand. This role will monitor visibility across priority AI search engines, diagnose why competitors appear in answers where we should qualify, and coordinate the content, technical SEO, PR, product marketing, and web fixes needed to improve our presence.\n\nResponsibilities:\n- Build and maintain prompt sets for brand, category, competitor, comparison, alternative, integration, use-case, pricing, security, and buying-intent questions.\n- Track AI mentions, citations, rankings, answer accuracy, sentiment, source patterns, and competitor share across priority engines.\n- Identify missing, outdated, weak, or untrusted sources that cause AI systems to omit, misrank, or misrepresent the brand.\n- Create content briefs that lead with direct answers, evidence, examples, product facts, comparison points, and citation-worthy claims.\n- Work with SEO and web teams to improve crawlability, indexability, internal linking, structured data, textual content, page freshness, and entity consistency.\n- Partner with PR, comms, review-site owners, analyst relations, and product marketing to strengthen third-party evidence and earned-source coverage.\n- Maintain a prioritized AEO backlog with owners, effort, impact, confidence, shipped dates, and observed movement.\n- Produce a monthly executive report covering AI share of voice, competitor changes, citation gaps, answer accuracy risks, shipped fixes, and next priorities.\n\nRequired experience:\n- 3+ years in SEO, content strategy, product marketing, digital PR, search analytics, or a closely related growth role.\n- Strong understanding of technical SEO fundamentals, Google Search quality guidance, and content that satisfies search intent.\n- Experience turning research into briefs, page updates, experiments, dashboards, and cross-functional action plans.\n- Comfort using AI search monitoring tools, analytics platforms, spreadsheets, crawlers, Search Console, and executive reporting workflows.\n- Clear writing style and strong judgment about evidence, claims, source quality, and brand positioning.\n- Ability to coordinate across content, SEO, PR, web, product marketing, sales, and leadership.\n\nPreferred experience:\n- Experience with B2B SaaS, marketplace, local, healthcare, financial, legal, cybersecurity, or other categories where AI answers influence trust and vendor selection.\n- Familiarity with prompt taxonomy, entity SEO, digital PR, review ecosystems, comparison pages, analyst relations, and AI citation tracking.\n- Experience building dashboards that separate signal from one-off AI answer variability.\n\nSuccess metrics:\n- Higher AI share of voice across priority prompt clusters.\n- Increased mention rate for high-intent buyer questions.\n- More owned and earned citation coverage in AI-generated answers.\n- Fewer competitor-only answers for prompts where the brand should qualify.\n- More accurate brand descriptions, product facts, and comparison statements.\n- Faster time from visibility gap to shipped fix.\n- Clearer executive understanding of AI search risk, opportunity, and investment needs.\n<\/code><\/pre>\n<p>If this becomes an actual job posting page, add <code>JobPosting<\/code> structured data only to the real job page, not to this editorial guide. Google&#39;s <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/appearance\/structured-data\/job-posting\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">JobPosting structured data documentation<\/a> says job markup belongs on job posting pages and must match visible page content.<\/p>\n<h2>What Is an AEO Specialist?<\/h2>\n<p>An AEO specialist is the owner of answer-level search visibility. They make sure the company is findable, understandable, credible, and accurately represented when AI systems generate answers to buyer questions.<\/p>\n<p>That matters because AI search is not just a different search results layout. Google explains that AI Overviews and AI Mode may use <strong>query fan-out<\/strong>, meaning the system can issue related searches across subtopics and sources before composing an answer. Google&#39;s <a href=\"https:\/\/developers.google.com\/search\/docs\/appearance\/ai-features\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AI features guidance<\/a> also says the same foundational SEO practices still apply and that there is no special schema required for AI Overviews or AI Mode.<\/p>\n<p>The commercial impact is also measurable. Pew Research Center analyzed March 2025 browsing data from 900 U.S. adults and 68,879 Google searches. In its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/short-reads\/2025\/07\/22\/google-users-are-less-likely-to-click-on-links-when-an-ai-summary-appears-in-the-results\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">July 2025 analysis<\/a>, users clicked a traditional result in 8% of visits when an AI summary appeared, compared with 15% when no AI summary appeared. Users clicked a link inside the AI summary in only 1% of visits with an AI summary.<\/p>\n<p>The hiring implication: someone has to own the visibility system before traffic loss shows up cleanly in analytics. AEO work includes prompt research, source analysis, entity consistency, answer accuracy, content improvements, earned evidence, and reporting.<\/p>\n<h2>Why the Role Exists Now<\/h2>\n<p>The role exists because AI answers can shape vendor preference before a buyer visits a website. Traditional SEO asks, &quot;Did the page rank and earn a click?&quot; AEO asks, &quot;Was the brand included, cited, described accurately, and recommended in the answer?&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Academic research has also formalized the shift. The <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2311.09735\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">GEO: Generative Engine Optimization paper<\/a>, accepted to KDD 2024, introduced a benchmark for evaluating visibility in generative engine responses and reported that tested optimization strategies could improve visibility by up to 40%, with results varying by domain.<\/p>\n<p>That does not mean a company can control every AI answer. It does mean the work needs ownership. Without ownership, AI visibility becomes screenshots in Slack, one-off content requests, and executive anxiety without a measurement loop.<\/p>\n<h2>AEO Specialist vs SEO Specialist vs GEO Specialist<\/h2>\n<p>An AEO specialist overlaps with SEO, but the unit of measurement is different. SEO focuses on pages, rankings, crawlability, links, and organic traffic. AEO focuses on prompts, answers, citations, mentions, competitor inclusion, sentiment, and brand accuracy.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Dimension<\/th>\n<th>SEO Specialist<\/th>\n<th>AEO Specialist<\/th>\n<th>GEO Specialist<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Primary goal<\/td>\n<td>Rank pages and earn qualified organic traffic<\/td>\n<td>Get the brand included, cited, and accurately described in AI answers<\/td>\n<td>Improve visibility in generative responses through answer-ready content and evidence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Research unit<\/td>\n<td>Keywords, SERPs, pages, backlinks<\/td>\n<td>Prompts, entities, answers, citations, competitor mentions<\/td>\n<td>Prompts, source sets, generated outputs, retrievable passages<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Content lens<\/td>\n<td>Search intent, topical depth, page quality<\/td>\n<td>Answer usefulness, extractable claims, evidence, source trust<\/td>\n<td>Passage-level clarity, attribution, structure, freshness<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Authority lens<\/td>\n<td>Links, topical authority, brand demand<\/td>\n<td>AI citations, earned media, reviews, third-party comparisons, co-mentions<\/td>\n<td>Source selection patterns across generative systems<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Measurement<\/td>\n<td>Rankings, clicks, impressions, conversions<\/td>\n<td>AI share of voice, mention rate, citation rate, sentiment, accuracy<\/td>\n<td>Visibility in generated answers and citation presence<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Common failure mode<\/td>\n<td>Optimizing pages without business context<\/td>\n<td>Tracking screenshots without repeatable measurement<\/td>\n<td>Treating AI optimization as prompt tricks instead of source quality<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The best first hire usually has SEO depth, content judgment, and enough product-marketing sense to understand why a buyer would or would not trust the brand.<\/p>\n<h2>What Should the AEO Specialist Own?<\/h2>\n<p>The AEO specialist should own the full <strong>prompt-to-proof loop<\/strong>: build the prompt universe, map sources, diagnose gaps, ship fixes, and prove movement. This keeps the job from becoming vague &quot;AI content&quot; work.<\/p>\n<p>At maxaeo, the clearest role charter uses five operating steps:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Prompt universe:<\/strong> Define the questions that matter by persona, funnel stage, product use case, competitor, and risk.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Source map:<\/strong> Identify which owned, earned, community, review, analyst, and competitor sources AI engines use.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Gap diagnosis:<\/strong> Separate content gaps, technical gaps, entity gaps, trust gaps, and off-site authority gaps.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fix queue:<\/strong> Turn findings into briefs, page updates, PR targets, profile updates, technical tickets, and reporting tasks.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Proof review:<\/strong> Measure before-and-after movement across prompt clusters, engines, citations, and competitors.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Ownership area<\/th>\n<th>What the specialist does<\/th>\n<th>Output<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Prompt research<\/td>\n<td>Builds buyer, brand, competitor, category, use-case, and high-intent prompt sets<\/td>\n<td>Prompt taxonomy by persona, funnel stage, and business value<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AI search monitoring<\/td>\n<td>Tracks mentions, rankings, citations, sentiment, answer accuracy, and competitors<\/td>\n<td>Weekly visibility dashboard<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Citation analysis<\/td>\n<td>Finds which sources AI engines cite and which sources are missing<\/td>\n<td>Citation gap list and source priority map<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Content strategy<\/td>\n<td>Turns weak or missing answers into briefs and updates<\/td>\n<td>Content backlog with evidence requirements<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Technical SEO coordination<\/td>\n<td>Checks indexability, rendering, internal links, canonicals, structured data, and textual availability<\/td>\n<td>Technical issue list with owners<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Entity consistency<\/td>\n<td>Aligns product names, company facts, descriptions, profiles, and claims<\/td>\n<td>Brand facts audit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PR and earned evidence<\/td>\n<td>Identifies third-party pages that influence AI citations<\/td>\n<td>Digital PR and profile update targets<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Executive reporting<\/td>\n<td>Explains movement, uncertainty, competitive risk, and next investment<\/td>\n<td>Monthly AEO report<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>For prompt discovery, start with buyer language before tool output. The maxaeo guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/prompt-research-aeo\">prompt research for AEO<\/a> explains how to find the questions buyers actually ask AI systems, not just the keywords they type into Google.<\/p>\n<h2>Core Responsibilities by Cadence<\/h2>\n<p>The role should have repeatable weekly, monthly, and quarterly work. Otherwise it becomes reactive.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Cadence<\/th>\n<th>Responsibilities<\/th>\n<th>Evidence of good execution<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Daily or weekly<\/td>\n<td>Monitor priority prompts, answer changes, competitor inclusions, citation shifts, and accuracy issues<\/td>\n<td>Clear notes on what changed, where, and whether it matters<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Weekly<\/td>\n<td>Review prompt clusters, update gap backlog, brief quick-win fixes, and coordinate with SEO\/content\/PR\/web owners<\/td>\n<td>Shipped tickets and briefs tied to specific answer gaps<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Monthly<\/td>\n<td>Produce executive AEO report with trend, risk, competitor movement, shipped fixes, and next priorities<\/td>\n<td>Leadership can see what changed and what to fund next<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Quarterly<\/td>\n<td>Rebuild prompt universe, refresh source maps, reassess competitors, and update scorecard targets<\/td>\n<td>Measurement reflects current products, markets, and buyer behavior<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A practical prompt set should cover more than brand prompts. Include category, alternatives, comparison, &quot;best tools,&quot; use-case, integration, pricing, security, implementation, risk, and buyer-role questions. For prompt portfolio sizing, use <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/how-many-ai-search-prompts-should-you-track\">How Many AI Search Prompts Should You Track?<\/a> as a planning baseline.<\/p>\n<h2>Skills Matrix for an AEO Specialist<\/h2>\n<p>A good AEO specialist is T-shaped: deep enough in SEO and content strategy to ship fixes, broad enough in analytics, PR, and product marketing to coordinate authority signals.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Skill<\/th>\n<th align=\"right\">Required level<\/th>\n<th>What to test<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Prompt research<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">5\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they build prompt clusters by persona, funnel stage, product use case, and buyer intent?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AI answer analysis<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">5\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they evaluate mentions, citations, sentiment, rank order, source quality, and answer accuracy?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Content strategy<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">5\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they turn AI answer gaps into briefs with clear claims, evidence, comparisons, and internal links?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Technical SEO<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">4\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they diagnose indexability, rendering, robots, canonicals, internal linking, schema, and page freshness issues?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Source judgment<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">5\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they tell the difference between a source AI systems can cite and a page that only repeats marketing copy?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Product marketing<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">4\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they translate ICP, positioning, use cases, proof points, and objections into answer-ready language?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Digital PR awareness<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">3\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they identify third-party sources worth influencing without treating PR as link building only?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Experiment design<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">4\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they avoid overclaiming from one answer and test clusters across engines, dates, and competitors?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Executive reporting<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">4\/5<\/td>\n<td>Can they explain visibility movement and uncertainty without jargon?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The differentiator is experiment design. AI answers vary by engine, prompt wording, geography, account state, recency, and source availability. A weak candidate checks one response and declares victory. A strong candidate tests prompt clusters repeatedly and reports confidence levels.<\/p>\n<h2>Hiring Scorecard<\/h2>\n<p>Use this scorecard to compare candidates. It rewards diagnosis and execution, not buzzword fluency.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Capability<\/th>\n<th align=\"right\">Weight<\/th>\n<th>Strong evidence<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Prompt taxonomy and buyer-intent mapping<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">15<\/td>\n<td>Groups prompts by ICP, funnel stage, use case, competitor, and commercial value<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>AI answer measurement<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">15<\/td>\n<td>Measures mention rate, AI share of voice, citation rate, sentiment, accuracy, and competitor-only answers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SEO and content diagnosis<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">20<\/td>\n<td>Connects answer gaps to crawlability, content structure, evidence quality, internal links, and page intent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Citation and source analysis<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">15<\/td>\n<td>Identifies owned, earned, review, community, analyst, and competitor sources that influence answers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Cross-functional shipping<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">15<\/td>\n<td>Can turn findings into briefs, tickets, PR targets, profile updates, and stakeholder action<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Experiment design<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">10<\/td>\n<td>Uses repeat runs, prompt clusters, time stamps, engine comparisons, and confidence notes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Executive communication<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">10<\/td>\n<td>Converts noisy AI data into decisions, risks, and next investment<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>A candidate scoring high in content but low in source analysis may be a content strategist, not an AEO specialist. A candidate scoring high in tools but low in diagnosis may produce dashboards without fixing the underlying visibility problem.<\/p>\n<h2>When Should a Company Hire an AEO Specialist?<\/h2>\n<p>Hire an AEO specialist when AI-generated answers influence how buyers discover, compare, trust, or shortlist vendors in your category. For B2B SaaS and other considered purchases, this can happen before organic traffic data shows a clear decline.<\/p>\n<p>The clearest triggers are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Buyers ask AI tools for &quot;best,&quot; &quot;top,&quot; &quot;alternative,&quot; &quot;comparison,&quot; &quot;pricing,&quot; &quot;security,&quot; &quot;integration,&quot; or &quot;implementation&quot; recommendations.<\/li>\n<li>Competitors appear in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, or AI Mode for prompts where your brand should qualify.<\/li>\n<li>AI answers describe your product incorrectly, omit key differentiators, or cite stale third-party pages.<\/li>\n<li>SEO, PR, product marketing, and web teams each own part of the fix, but no one owns the full system.<\/li>\n<li>Leadership wants AI share of voice, competitor tracking, and answer accuracy reporting instead of screenshots.<\/li>\n<li>Sales or customer success teams report that buyers are arriving with AI-shaped assumptions about the category.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For buyer-language examples, use <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/high-intent-ai-search-prompts-how-buyers-ask-for-product-recommendations\">High-Intent AI Search Prompts<\/a> to identify the prompts most likely to influence vendor shortlists.<\/p>\n<h2>In-House, Agency, or Contractor?<\/h2>\n<p>The right model depends on how much of the fix requires internal coordination.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Model<\/th>\n<th>Best for<\/th>\n<th>Risk<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>In-house AEO specialist<\/td>\n<td>Categories where AI answers affect pipeline, brand risk, sales enablement, or executive reporting<\/td>\n<td>Slow ramp if the company lacks SEO, content, or PR support<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Agency<\/td>\n<td>Baseline audits, multi-engine monitoring, citation-gap analysis, reporting setup, and overflow execution<\/td>\n<td>Recommendations may stall if internal owners do not ship fixes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Contractor<\/td>\n<td>Prompt research, source mapping, content briefs, or one-time competitive analysis<\/td>\n<td>Limited authority to coordinate PR, web, product marketing, and leadership<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Hybrid<\/td>\n<td>Most B2B teams starting a serious AEO program<\/td>\n<td>Requires clear ownership so agency work does not become disconnected reporting<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>If the brand is often omitted because AI engines cite competitor pages, review sites, forums, or third-party explainers, the specialist must know how to diagnose those source patterns. The maxaeo article on <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/why-ai-search-engines-cite-competitor-pages-instead-of-yours\">why AI search engines cite competitor pages instead of yours<\/a> is a useful companion for that part of the role.<\/p>\n<h2>Where Should the Role Sit?<\/h2>\n<p>The AEO specialist should sit where fixes can ship. In most companies, that means SEO, organic growth, demand generation, product marketing, or integrated marketing, with close collaboration across PR, comms, web, and sales.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Company stage<\/th>\n<th>Best reporting line<\/th>\n<th>Why<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Early startup<\/td>\n<td>Head of Growth or founder-led marketing<\/td>\n<td>Speed and positioning clarity matter more than specialization<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>SEO-led growth team<\/td>\n<td>Director of SEO or Organic Growth<\/td>\n<td>Technical and content fixes already have a workflow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Product-led B2B SaaS<\/td>\n<td>Product Marketing or Demand Generation<\/td>\n<td>The role needs buyer-language, use-case, and competitive positioning access<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Brand-sensitive category<\/td>\n<td>Comms or Brand with SEO partnership<\/td>\n<td>AI misrepresentation can become a reputational risk<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Enterprise<\/td>\n<td>Integrated Marketing or Demand Gen<\/td>\n<td>Cross-functional execution and executive reporting need structure<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Agency<\/td>\n<td>Client strategy pod with SEO, content, analytics, and PR support<\/td>\n<td>Multiple clients need repeatable monitoring and delivery systems<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Avoid burying the role inside content production if the person cannot influence technical SEO, PR, review-site profiles, analyst pages, product positioning, or executive reporting.<\/p>\n<h2>Seniority and Compensation Calibration<\/h2>\n<p>The first AEO hire should usually be a senior individual contributor or manager-level operator. A junior hire can help with prompt checks and content updates, but the first owner needs enough judgment to influence SEO, PR, web, product marketing, and leadership.<\/p>\n<p>Because &quot;AEO specialist&quot; salary benchmarks are still inconsistent, calibrate compensation against comparable roles in your market:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Senior SEO specialist or SEO manager<\/strong> for technical and content ownership.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Product marketing manager<\/strong> for positioning, competitive narrative, and use-case depth.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Growth analytics or marketing operations<\/strong> for measurement, dashboards, and experimentation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Digital PR or communications strategist<\/strong> for earned-source and reputation work.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If the role is accountable for executive reporting and cross-functional shipping, do not price it like a junior content writer. If the role is limited to updating briefs from an existing AEO strategy, a specialist-level band may be enough.<\/p>\n<h2>First 90 Days for an AEO Specialist<\/h2>\n<p>The first 90 days should produce a baseline, a prioritized backlog, shipped fixes, and an executive-ready narrative. Give the new hire a category, competitor set, prompt scope, engine list, and reporting cadence.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Timeframe<\/th>\n<th>Main focus<\/th>\n<th>Expected output<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Days 1-30<\/td>\n<td>Baseline AI visibility<\/td>\n<td>Prompt taxonomy, priority engines, competitor set, current mentions, citations, sentiment, answer accuracy issues, and source map<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Days 31-60<\/td>\n<td>Diagnose and ship fixes<\/td>\n<td>Top content gaps, technical checks, brand facts audit, citation targets, first briefs, profile updates, and quick-win page improvements<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Days 61-90<\/td>\n<td>Prove movement<\/td>\n<td>Before-and-after report, shipped fix log, experiment learnings, confidence notes, and next-quarter roadmap<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The 90-day review should answer five questions:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Which prompts matter most to pipeline, brand risk, or competitive positioning?<\/li>\n<li>Where is the brand missing, misranked, uncited, or misdescribed?<\/li>\n<li>Which sources are AI engines using instead?<\/li>\n<li>Which fixes shipped, and what changed after shipping?<\/li>\n<li>What should the company fund next?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The specialist should also map which search indexes and source systems matter for each AI engine. For that operating context, see maxaeo&#39;s guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/which-search-engines-power-ai-answers\">which search index powers each AI engine<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Interview Questions That Reveal Real AEO Judgment<\/h2>\n<p>Interview for diagnosis, not terminology. Many candidates can define answer engine optimization. Fewer can explain why a brand is missing from a high-intent AI shortlist and what to fix first.<\/p>\n<p>Use these questions:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Prompt strategy:<\/strong> How would you build a prompt set for a B2B SaaS company in a crowded category?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Competitor diagnosis:<\/strong> ChatGPT recommends three competitors but not us for a high-intent prompt. What data would you collect before proposing fixes?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Citation analysis:<\/strong> Perplexity cites a competitor comparison page, a Reddit thread, and an analyst article. What would you do next?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Content quality:<\/strong> What makes a page easier for AI systems to cite without making it worse for human readers?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Technical SEO:<\/strong> Which crawlability, rendering, or structured-data issues could block AI visibility even if the content is strong?<\/li>\n<li><strong>PR collaboration:<\/strong> How would you prioritize third-party sources for AI citation influence?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reporting:<\/strong> How would you explain a drop in AI share of voice to a CRO without overreacting to one day&#39;s data?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Governance:<\/strong> What claims should a company avoid making when trying to get recommended by AI answer engines?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Experiment design:<\/strong> How would you distinguish platform volatility from real improvement?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Executive communication:<\/strong> What would you include in a monthly AI visibility report and what would you leave out?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Strong answers mention prompt clusters, repeated tests, source analysis, competitor baselines, evidence quality, technical eligibility, shipped fixes, and confidence levels. Weak answers rely on &quot;write better content&quot; or &quot;add schema&quot; as the default solution.<\/p>\n<h2>Practical Work Sample for Finalists<\/h2>\n<p>A finalist work sample should simulate the actual job: read AI answers, diagnose gaps, and prioritize fixes. Keep it time-boxed. Do not ask candidates to produce a full unpaid strategy.<\/p>\n<p>Give the candidate a mock dataset with 30 prompts across five clusters:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Prompt cluster<\/th>\n<th>Example prompt<\/th>\n<th>What to evaluate<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Category shortlist<\/td>\n<td>&quot;Best tools for AI search monitoring in B2B SaaS&quot;<\/td>\n<td>Is the brand mentioned, ranked, cited, or omitted?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Competitor alternative<\/td>\n<td>&quot;Best alternatives to [competitor] for AI visibility tracking&quot;<\/td>\n<td>Does the answer include your brand and explain why?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Use case<\/td>\n<td>&quot;How can a SaaS company track brand mentions in ChatGPT?&quot;<\/td>\n<td>Are owned pages or third-party sources cited?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Trust and risk<\/td>\n<td>&quot;Is [brand] accurate for AI reputation management?&quot;<\/td>\n<td>Is sentiment accurate and evidence-based?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Buying committee<\/td>\n<td>&quot;Which AI visibility tool should an SEO lead use for executive reporting?&quot;<\/td>\n<td>Does the answer align with ICP and value proposition?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Ask for four artifacts:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>A prompt taxonomy with priority scores.<\/li>\n<li>A visibility summary covering mentions, citations, sentiment, and competitor share.<\/li>\n<li>A diagnosis of the top five gaps.<\/li>\n<li>A 30-day action plan with owners, effort, expected impact, and risks.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Use this rubric:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Evaluation area<\/th>\n<th>Strong response<\/th>\n<th>Weak response<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Pattern recognition<\/td>\n<td>Groups answers by prompt intent and engine behavior<\/td>\n<td>Treats each answer as an isolated event<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Source diagnosis<\/td>\n<td>Identifies which sources shape the answer<\/td>\n<td>Only says the brand needs more content<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Prioritization<\/td>\n<td>Separates quick wins from structural authority gaps<\/td>\n<td>Recommends everything at once<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Measurement<\/td>\n<td>Uses repeatable metrics and confidence notes<\/td>\n<td>Reports screenshots as proof<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Business judgment<\/td>\n<td>Connects fixes to pipeline, positioning, or risk<\/td>\n<td>Optimizes for visibility without business context<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>Metrics to Put in the Job Scorecard<\/h2>\n<p>The best AEO scorecards combine visibility, accuracy, action, and business context. Do not rely on traffic alone because AI answers can influence demand without producing a click.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Metric<\/th>\n<th>What it tells you<\/th>\n<th>How to use it<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>AI share of voice<\/td>\n<td>How often the brand appears relative to competitors<\/td>\n<td>Track by prompt cluster and engine<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Mention rate<\/td>\n<td>Whether the brand is included at all<\/td>\n<td>Use for early visibility growth<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rank or order position<\/td>\n<td>Whether the brand is recommended prominently or buried<\/td>\n<td>Track for shortlist-style prompts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Citation rate<\/td>\n<td>Whether owned or earned sources support the answer<\/td>\n<td>Tie to content, PR, and source-quality fixes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Competitor-only answers<\/td>\n<td>Where rivals are recommended without the brand<\/td>\n<td>Prioritize high-intent gaps<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Answer accuracy<\/td>\n<td>Whether AI describes the company correctly<\/td>\n<td>Feed brand facts and reputation work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sentiment<\/td>\n<td>Whether descriptions are positive, neutral, or negative<\/td>\n<td>Escalate brand-risk patterns<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Source diversity<\/td>\n<td>Whether AI relies on only one source type<\/td>\n<td>Balance owned, earned, review, community, and analyst coverage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Fix velocity<\/td>\n<td>How quickly gaps become shipped improvements<\/td>\n<td>Manage cross-functional execution<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Branded search lift<\/td>\n<td>Whether AI exposure may be creating later demand<\/td>\n<td>Pair with Search Console and analytics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Google says sites appearing in AI features are included in Search Console performance reporting under the Web search type, but that does not replace AI-answer-level tracking. Search Console can show Google Search performance. It will not explain every ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, or Grok answer your buyers see.<\/p>\n<h2>What Pages and Assets Should the Specialist Improve?<\/h2>\n<p>The AEO specialist should not only create blog posts. Many AI visibility gaps come from missing proof, stale third-party pages, weak comparison content, or inconsistent entity facts.<\/p>\n<p>Common fix targets include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Category pages:<\/strong> Clear explanation of what the product is, who it is for, and when it is a fit.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Use-case pages:<\/strong> Specific workflows, buyer pains, proof points, and outcomes.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Comparison pages:<\/strong> Fair, evidence-led comparisons against competitor categories or alternatives.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Integration pages:<\/strong> Technical and business context for tools buyers ask about together.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Security and trust pages:<\/strong> Compliance, privacy, implementation, support, and risk information.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Pricing and packaging pages:<\/strong> Clear commercial context where appropriate.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Customer proof:<\/strong> Case studies, quotes, benchmarks, implementation details, and before-after context.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Third-party profiles:<\/strong> Review sites, directories, partner pages, analyst mentions, and community references.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Brand facts:<\/strong> Consistent product names, descriptions, target users, use cases, and company facts across the web.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The strongest pages are written for humans first but structured so machines can extract accurate claims. Use direct answers, comparison tables, dated facts, clear product terminology, visible evidence, and links to supporting sources.<\/p>\n<h2>Common Hiring Mistakes<\/h2>\n<p>The most common mistake is hiring for content volume instead of answer ownership. Publishing more pages will not fix an AI visibility problem if the brand lacks credible proof, consistent entity signals, crawlable content, or third-party sources that answer engines trust.<\/p>\n<p>Avoid these mistakes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Hiring only a writer:<\/strong> Writing matters, but the role also needs analytics, technical SEO, source judgment, and cross-functional influence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Treating AEO as schema work:<\/strong> Structured data can help machines understand content, but Google says there is no special schema required to appear in AI Overviews or AI Mode.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reporting screenshots as strategy:<\/strong> Screenshots are useful examples, not a measurement system.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ignoring earned media:<\/strong> Many AI answers rely on third-party sources, not only owned pages.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Overpromising control:<\/strong> No specialist can guarantee a recommendation in every AI answer.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Skipping accuracy work:<\/strong> Visibility without accurate product descriptions can create sales confusion and reputational risk.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tracking only branded prompts:<\/strong> Branded prompts show reputation, but category and comparison prompts show market influence.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ignoring source freshness:<\/strong> Stale profiles, old pricing pages, outdated comparison posts, and abandoned directories can all influence answers.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The right hire builds baselines, finds patterns, ships fixes, measures movement, and explains uncertainty clearly.<\/p>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>What should be included in an AEO specialist job description?<\/h3>\n<p>An AEO specialist job description should include ownership of prompt research, AI search monitoring, citation analysis, content briefs, technical SEO coordination, PR collaboration, brand-accuracy work, and executive reporting. It should also define measurable outcomes such as AI share of voice, mention rate, citation coverage, answer accuracy, competitor-only answers, and fix velocity.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the difference between an AEO specialist and an SEO specialist?<\/h3>\n<p>An SEO specialist focuses on rankings, crawlability, page quality, links, and organic traffic. An AEO specialist measures whether the brand appears, is cited, is accurately described, and is recommended in AI-generated answers. The roles overlap, but AEO adds prompt tracking, citation analysis, answer accuracy, competitor co-mentions, and AI share of voice.<\/p>\n<h3>Should the role sit under SEO, PR, or product marketing?<\/h3>\n<p>Most teams should start under SEO or organic growth because crawlability, content quality, internal linking, and measurement matter. PR and product marketing should be close partners because earned sources, review sites, analyst pages, competitor positioning, and proof points often influence AI answers. In brand-sensitive categories, communications may own the program with SEO execution support.<\/p>\n<h3>How senior should the first AEO hire be?<\/h3>\n<p>The first hire should be senior enough to influence other teams. If the role only executes briefs, it will stall when fixes require PR outreach, web changes, product positioning, review-site updates, or executive tradeoffs. For most B2B SaaS teams, a senior individual contributor or manager-level operator is a better first hire than a junior specialist.<\/p>\n<h3>Can an agency handle AEO instead?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, especially for baseline research, prompt tracking, citation-gap analysis, dashboards, and backlog creation. In-house ownership becomes more important when fixes require deep product knowledge, fast content updates, executive alignment, and coordination with SEO, PR, web, and product marketing. Many teams start hybrid: agency for measurement and analysis, internal owner for prioritization and shipping.<\/p>\n<h3>What tools should an AEO specialist know?<\/h3>\n<p>An AEO specialist should be comfortable with AI search monitoring tools, Search Console, analytics platforms, spreadsheets, SEO crawlers, content management systems, rank tracking, PR or media databases, review-site workflows, and dashboarding tools. Tool fluency matters less than the ability to connect answer gaps to sources, fixes, owners, and measurable outcomes.<\/p>\n<h3>Should an AEO specialist guarantee that ChatGPT recommends the company?<\/h3>\n<p>No. AI answer engines are variable, and no role can guarantee inclusion for every prompt. A credible AEO specialist should commit to a measurable process: define the prompt universe, monitor answers, diagnose source and content gaps, ship fixes, improve evidence quality, and report movement with confidence levels.<\/p>\n<h3>Should this article use JobPosting schema?<\/h3>\n<p>No. This article should use Article schema. Use JobPosting structured data only on a real job posting page where the job description, employer, location or remote eligibility, application path, and required fields are visible and accurate.<\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@graph\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Article\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/aeo-specialist-job-description#article\",\n      \"headline\": \"AEO Specialist Job Description: Responsibilities, Skills, Scorecard, and JD Template\",\n      \"description\": \"Use this AEO specialist job description to hire for AI search: responsibilities, skills, scorecard, interview questions, 90-day plan, metrics, and a copy-ready JD.\",\n      \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n        \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n        \"@id\": \"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/aeo-specialist-job-description\"\n      },\n      \"author\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"maxaeo\"\n      },\n      \"publisher\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"maxaeo\"\n      },\n      \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-07\",\n      \"dateModified\": \"2026-07-07\",\n      \"image\": \"image-placeholder\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/aeo-specialist-job-description#faq\",\n      \"mainEntity\": [\n        {\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\n          \"name\": \"What should be included in an AEO specialist job description?\",\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n            \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n            \"text\": \"An AEO specialist job description should include ownership of prompt research, AI search monitoring, citation analysis, content briefs, technical SEO coordination, PR collaboration, brand-accuracy work, and executive reporting. It should also define measurable outcomes such as AI share of voice, mention rate, citation coverage, answer accuracy, competitor-only answers, and fix velocity.\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\n          \"name\": \"What is the difference between an AEO specialist and an SEO specialist?\",\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n            \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n            \"text\": \"An SEO specialist focuses on rankings, crawlability, page quality, links, and organic traffic. An AEO specialist measures whether the brand appears, is cited, is accurately described, and is recommended in AI-generated answers. The roles overlap, but AEO adds prompt tracking, citation analysis, answer accuracy, competitor co-mentions, and AI share of voice.\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\n          \"name\": \"Should the role sit under SEO, PR, or product marketing?\",\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n            \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n            \"text\": \"Most teams should start under SEO or organic growth because crawlability, content quality, internal linking, and measurement matter. PR and product marketing should be close partners because earned sources, review sites, analyst pages, competitor positioning, and proof points often influence AI answers. In brand-sensitive categories, communications may own the program with SEO execution support.\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\n          \"name\": \"How senior should the first AEO hire be?\",\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n            \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n            \"text\": \"The first hire should be senior enough to influence other teams. If the role only executes briefs, it will stall when fixes require PR outreach, web changes, product positioning, review-site updates, or executive tradeoffs. For most B2B SaaS teams, a senior individual contributor or manager-level operator is a better first hire than a junior specialist.\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\n          \"name\": \"Can an agency handle AEO instead?\",\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n            \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n            \"text\": \"Yes, especially for baseline research, prompt tracking, citation-gap analysis, dashboards, and backlog creation. In-house ownership becomes more important when fixes require deep product knowledge, fast content updates, executive alignment, and coordination with SEO, PR, web, and product marketing.\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"@type\": \"Question\",\n          \"name\": \"Should an AEO specialist guarantee that ChatGPT recommends the company?\",\n          \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n            \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n            \"text\": \"No. AI answer engines are variable, and no role can guarantee inclusion for every prompt. A credible AEO specialist should commit to a measurable process: define the prompt universe, monitor answers, diagnose source and content gaps, ship fixes, improve evidence quality, and report movement with confidence levels.\"\n          }\n        }\n      ]\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Use this AEO specialist job description to hire for AI search: responsibilities, skills, scorecard, interview questions, 90-day plan, metrics, and a copy-ready JD.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1035,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1036"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1036\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/maxaeo.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}